Applications

Videos

Historic Properties Properties For Sale About The Commission Browse By Topic Local History Links Home Page
                                            

Director's Report

June 12, 2000

 

1. The closing on the W. T. Alexander Plantation should occur in the very near future. There are several issues that the seller still needs to address. First, Cambridge Properties did not include an access easement in the contract it signed with the new owners of the property to the immediate west of the land the Commission will buy. Cambridge Properties says that it simply overlooked this detail. Second, the adjoining property protrudes slightly into the grassy area on the northern edge of the W. T. Alexander Plantation. I have instructed Patricia Nystrom to seek a conservation easement or to determine how much it would cost for the Commission to buy a small segment of property on the northern edge of the property. The inclusion of this land would fulfill the Commission's desire to protect the visual character of the W. T. Alexander Plantation.

2. There are yet to be any offers on the Croft Schoolhouse. The project is finished. I have been disappointed with the amount of exposure Roper Land Company provided for the property.

3. The Mecklenburg County Park and Recreation Department has approached me about the Commission's cooperating on the purchase of the Davis Farm on Hucks Road. This might be an excellent new site for the McAuley House. The Commission will be receiving the donation of this house in the very near future.

4. Pappas Properties has informed me that it will be interested in proceeding with the preservation of the Charlotte Cotton Mills even if the Federal Tax Credits will not be available if one-third of the building is demolished. I did talk with Archives and History, and they do believe the building would most likely qualify for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. In my opinion, if the Commission does not participate in this project, Pappas Properties will not exercise its option to purchase the building -- which would most likely lead to its eventual demolition.

5. I met with members of the Board of Historic Charlotte, Inc. about the possibility of that organization's serving as a vehicle for assuring tax deductibility of donations of property made in connection with HLC projects. Tony Pressley, President of Historic Charlotte, stated that he would recommend to his board that Historic Charlotte do this in two instances at no cost other than reimbursement for expenses but that thereafter the nature of the arrangement be reviewed. In my judgment, despite Historic Charlotte's generous offer, it would be wise for the Commission to move forward with the creation of its own not-for-profit affiliate that would only exist to receive donations of property on behalf of the HLC. Regardless, the HLC will have to have such an institution available for its use.

6. The operating budget for the HLC seems to be headed for approval. It does contain money to provide clerical staff assistance for design review and processing properties for historic landmark designation. The betterment to match the grant to conduct a survey of early 20th century industrial and institutional architecture seems somewhat problematic. If the betterment is not approved, the Commission will have to find other funds to match the grant. If none is found, the grant will have to be returned.

7. The Preservation Workshop is scheduled for June 16th. Special thanks to the Mecklenburg County Park and Recreation Department for waiving the fee for the assembly building at the William R. Davie Park.

8. I still have no word with respect to the status of the Palmer Fire School.

9.  The owners of the Gluyas House are moving ahead with restoration.  The Gluyas House and grounds were designated as a historic landmark by the Board of County Commissioners on June 6th.  The National Register Advisory Committee will consider the house for National Register listing.

Respectfully submitted

Dr. Dan L. Morrill