THE NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY PROCESS
by Dr. Thomas W. Hanchett
In 1981 the Charlotte Mecklenburg Historic Properties
Commission, a city-county agency, began a three-and-a-half year
project to record buildings in the city's older neighborhoods and
identify those of historic and architectural importance. Phase I of
this Charlotte Neighborhood Survey focused on the Central City
area, Charlotte's oldest section, on Biddleville, its earliest
well-preserved black neighborhood, and on Myers Park and the newer
sections of Dilworth, the city's two finest pre-World War I
suburbs. Phase II targeted three more early suburbs -- Elizabeth,
Plaza Midwood, and Crescent Heights -- plus Cherry, believed to be
a turn-of-the-century "model Negro housing development." Phase III
included suburban Eastover and Washington Heights, plus the
blue-collar textile mill neighborhoods of Belmont-Villa Heights,
Chadwick Hoskins, and North Charlotte. This work covers all
important pre-World War II development areas in the City of
Charlotte.
The work of a neighborhood survey goes far beyond consulting
published histories of an area. Each building in the target
neighborhoods is photographed. Research is done in early city
directories, property deeds, and even in water hook-up records to
determine when the structures were built and who their earliest
occupants were. This data will be kept on file permanently by the
North Carolina Division of Archives and History in Raleigh. The
Neighborhood Survey produces a report with a written history of
each neighborhood, its development, architecture and residents. The
report also includes essays focusing on the city's architectural
development and city planning efforts, as well as a broad history
of the growth of the city as a whole.
The Neighborhood Survey's final product is a list of buildings
and places that should be considered for local designation as
"historic properties." Under North Carolina law N.C.G.S.
160A-399.4, local governing bodies are empowered to designate a
structure or site as an historic property if it possesses "special
significance in terms of its history, architecture, and/or cultural
importance." Such properties must also possess "integrity of
design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling and/or
association."
Within the City of Charlotte, the City Council makes such
determinations after careful study by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Historic Properties Commission. Each prospective property
identified by the Survey is placed on the Commission's Study List,
and an exhaustive Survey and Research Report is prepared on it by a
trained historian and architectural historian. Based on the report,
the Commission votes whether or not to recommend the property to
City Council for consideration.
If the Commission votes affirmatively, a public hearing is
scheduled before Council to ensure input from property owners and
other interested citizens. The report is also forwarded to the
staff of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History in
Raleigh for further professional comment. Based on this extensive
groundwork, the City Council decides whether the property is of
such significance to the community that it merits the special
protection of historic property status.
One important benefit of designation is community recognition of
its historic resources. A free pamphlet distributed by the
Commission, entitled Historic Properties in Charlotte-Mecklenburg,
includes photographs and historic information on all historic
sites. Owners of designated historic properties are entitled to
apply for a fifty percent deferral of ad valorem property taxes. If
the property is later altered to such an extent that it is deemed
no longer historic, the owner must pay back three years of the
deferred tax. Before the owner can make any material alteration to
the property, he or she must notify the Historic Properties
Commission, which grants a Certificate of Appropriateness if it is
convinced that the alteration will not harm the property's historic
character.
Unfortunately, under North Carolina law, the Commission cannot
forbid demolition of a designated historic property. It can, at
most, require the owner to wait for 180 days. This provision is
intended to give the Commission and community time to work with the
owner to find a way to save the structure.
The Charlotte Neighborhood Survey primarily identifies
individual properties for potential local designation. Local
historic property designation is only one of three legal mechanisms
available in North Carolina to help protect older buildings,
however.
The locally designated historic district is a way to preserve
important groups of structures. People have come to realize that
individual landmarks can become meaningless out of context. The
church surrounded by expressways or the grand mansion in the midst
of used car lots give no feeling for the neighborhoods they once
dominated. A street of modest bungalows, preserved in their
original condition, tell us as much about a past era as the
isolated birthplace of a famous person.
The process of designating a district moves from research to
approval by City Council in much the same way as for an individual
property. District designation carries fewer regulations than
individual designation, and includes no tax reduction.
The third legal preservation tool is the National Register of
Historic Places. It is a list, kept by the Secretary of the
Interior in Washington, of buildings and districts that should be
treated with care when federal money is spent. The Register came to
maturity in the 1960s when federally funded Urban Renewal and
highway building were inadvertently destroying important sites.
Historic places of local and regional, as well as national,
significance are safeguarded under its provisions.
The Division of Archives and History in Raleigh handles National
Register designation for North Carolina. Nominations to the
National Register are researched and reviewed extremely thoroughly,
and designation is considered an honor and a mark of authenticity.
Listing in the register places no controls on private owners, but
rather regulates government-funded projects.
In 1981 President Ronald Reagan added a new provision to
National Register designation. Now, owners who renovate buildings
listed in the Register may take a twenty-five percent investment
tax credit -that is, deduct one-fourth of their renovation costs
directly from the income tax that they owe the federal government.
The renovation must be substantial, amounting to more than the base
value of the structure. It must follow guidelines prepared by the
office of the Secretary of the Interior to ensure that the historic
character of the building is maintained. Finally, the renovated
structure must be used for income-producing purposes. This tax
provision has made historic preservation extremely attractive to
investors, and has already resulted in the adaptive reuse of
Charlotte's Mecklenburg Investment Company building and old
Dilworth Fire Station.
The present Charlotte Neighborhood Survey builds on earlier work
done in the city and county. Since 1973, when the Historic
Properties Commission was first chartered, over 80 structures have
been designated historic properties. Many of these have been
brought to the Commission's attention by owners, elected officials,
Commission members and community residents.
In 1976 the first effort was made to systematize the study
process by making a large-scale "inventory" of buildings. During
that summer, University of North Carolina at Charlotte professor
James Vaseff, University of Virginia professor H. McKelden Smith
and student volunteers carried out a quick survey to record
pre-1900 buildings throughout Mecklenburg, one of North Carolina's
earliest inventories. Though dating was somewhat unreliable due to
heavy reliance on county tax office records, the project did
produce data cards on some 1,700 properties and is now part of the
working files of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Planning Commission.
A second, more in-depth, survey occurred in 1978 of a single
neighborhood, the original grid street area of Dilworth. Historian
Dr. Dan Morrill and architectural historian Ruth Little-Stokes
produced a thick manuscript, Architectural Analysis: Dilworth:
Charlotte's Initial Streetcar Suburb under the sponsorship of the
Dilworth Community Development Organization. It identified a number
or individually significant buildings that have subsequently been
designated by City Council, and proposed that the core of the area
be named a local Historic District, an action taken by the City
Council in 1983. The present Charlotte Neighborhood Survey extends
this process to other early Charlotte neighborhoods.
|