Commercial Row Of Four Buildings At 100, 102,104, & 106
Main Street, Huntersville, N. C.

100, 102, 104, and 106 Main Street, Huntersville
This report was written on 25 February 1992
1. Names and locations of the properties: The properties known as
the commercial row of four buildings are located at 100, 102, 104, and 106
Main Street, Huntersville, in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
2. Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the present owners of the
properties: The owners of the properties are:
100 Main Street
Ms. Sara Marlene McCraw
Photography Unlimited, 100 Main Street
Huntersville, North Carolina 28078
Telephone: (704) 875-9718
Tax Parcel Number: 019-041-11
Deed Book 4781, Page 0061
104 Main Street
Mr. Cecil D. Bradford and wife, Beverly C.
P 0. Box 797
Huntersville, North Carolina 28078
Telephone: (704) 875-6775
Tax Parcel Number: 019-041-09
Deed Book 3726, Page 0930
102 Main Street
Mr. Joyce Lee Hager
10400 Sam Furr Road
Huntersville, North Carolina
Telephone: (704) 892-5300
Tax Parcel Number: 019-041-10
Deed Book 3694, Page 0496
106 Main Street
Mr. Jerry Kornegay and wife, Emily
1210 Yuma Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28213
Telephone: (704) 875-6080 (Business)
Tax Parcel Number: 019-041-08
Deed Book 5144, Page 0214
3. Representative photographs of the properties: This report contains
representative photographs of the properties.
4. A map depicting the location of the properties: This report
contains maps which depict the location of the properties.
5. Current Deed Book References to the properties: The most recent
deeds to the Tax Parcels, as listed in Mecklenburg County Deed Books, are
given above in item 2.
6. A brief historical sketch of the properties: This report
contains a brief historical sketch of the properties prepared by Ms. Paula
M. Stathakis.
7. Brief architectural descriptions of the properties: This report
contains brief architectural descriptions of the properties prepared by Ms.
Nora M. Black.
8. Documentation of how and in what ways the properties meet criteria
for designation set forth in N.C.G.S. 160A-400.5:
a. Special significance in terms of history, architecture, and /or
cultural importance: The Commission judges that the properties known
as the Commercial Row of Four Buildings does possess special significance
in terms of Huntersville and Mecklenburg County. The Commission bases its
judgment on the following considerations: 1) the town of Huntersville was
chartered on March 9, 1887; 2) Huntersville was a railroad town with Main
Street parallel to the tracks; 3) Huntersville's commercial district began
developing next to the railroad tracks as early as 1877; 4) the building
at 100 Main Street is a good example of the location of early banks at
important intersections as well as the use of the classical style to draw
customers; 5) the building at 102 Main Street served the town as a grocery
store for much of the 20th century; 6) the building at 104 Main Street is
a fine example of an early two-story commercial structure; 7) the building
at 106 Main Street is an example of changes that occurred among
storefronts in typical commercial rows; and 8) the four buildings, when
viewed together, are the last remnant of historic fabric that comprised
Huntersville's once-thriving commercial district.
b. Integrity of design, setting, workmanship materials feeling,
and/or association: The Commission contends that the architectural
descriptions by Ms. Nora M. Black included in this report demonstrate that
the commercial row of four buildings meets this criterion.
9. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The Commission is aware that
designation would allow the owner to apply for an automatic deferral of 50%
of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property which becomes
a designated "historic landmark." The current appraised value of the
improvements, the current appraised value of the land included in the Tax
Parcels, and the total appraised value of the properties are given below.
The properties are zoned CB.
| 100 Main Street |
102 Main Street |
| Tax Parcel Number: 019-041-11 |
Tax Parcel Number: 019-041-10 |
| Improvements = $13,550 |
Improvements = $15,850 |
| Land = $4,900 |
Land = $5,360 |
| Total Appraised Value = $18,450 |
Total Appraised Value = $21,210 |
| 104 Main Street |
106 Main Street |
| Tax Parcel Number: 019-041-09 |
Tax Parcel Number: 01 9-041-08 |
| Improvements = $13,960 |
Improvements = $17,940 |
| Land = $3,830 |
Land = $3,830 |
| Total Appraised Value = $17,790 |
Total Appraised Value = $21,770 |
Date of Preparation of this Report: 25 February 1992
Prepared by: Dr. Dan L. Morrill in conjunction with Ms. Nora M.
Black
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission
The Law Building, Suite 100, 730 East Trade Street
P 0. Box 35434
Charlotte, North Carolina
Telephone: 704/376-9115
Historical Overview of Commercial
Row
by P.M. Stathakis
The town of Huntersville is situated fourteen miles north of Charlotte
and was chartered on March 9, 1887.1 Like other small towns in
Mecklenburg County, Huntersville was a railroad town and it grew as a
function of the Atlantic, Tennessee and Ohio Railroad (now the Norfolk
Southern Railroad) whose tracks run parallel to Main Street. The track of
the A. T.& O. was relaid in 1874; the town that would be known as
Huntersville began its development along these tracks in 1877.2
Huntersville was originally called Craighead, N.C. and was later named for a
member of the Hunter family. 3
Huntersville was important in the late nineteenth century as a center for
higher education. The Huntersville High School Academy, established in 1878,
was one of the first of two high schools in western North Carolina. 4
In 1898, Anchor Mills established a plant in Huntersville, adding an element
of economic diversity to the predominantly rural region. 5 Some
of the more progressive citizens of the town, caught up in the general
climate of boosterism of the times, argued in favor of industrial growth for
their town as early as the 1880s. Anyone who has taken even a casual
interest in the development of Huntersville has encountered a letter written
by William Joseph Ranson to Ellen Viola Hunter in 1888, in which Ranson
declares that "Huntersville has the factory fever". 6 In spite of
the school and the cotton mill, Huntersville remained a small town and
retained its rural character throughout the twentieth century.
A small commercial row grew up along these railroad tracks in the late
nineteenth century. What is significant about Huntersville and its small
commercial row is that it is exemplary of the rural town in Mecklenburg
County. Its development along the railroad connected the town to distant
markets and made the town an important commercial center for area farmers
and the distribution center for the area cotton crop. The Main Street of
Huntersville is similar to the Main Streets of other small Mecklenburg
towns, because, like Matthews or Pineville, it is arranged along a railroad.
Travelers who went to Huntersville by train arrived in this commercial
center of town. The principal stores occupied one side of one block (to the
west of the railroad tracks).7
The building on the corner of Main Street and Gilead Road, 100 Main
Street, was the site of the North Mecklenburg Bank. Other banks subsequently
occupied this building: The Bank of Huntersville, The Bank of Cornelius and
First Union National Bank. 8 First Union National Bank sold the
building in 1976. 9 It is currently used as a photography studio.
The building immediately south of the bank, 102 Main Street, once housed
Smith's Grocery Store. It was purchased by B. H. and Glenna Smith in 1944
from the Kerns family. 10
The building adjacent to Smith's Grocery, 104 Main Street, was once
Mullen's Drug Store. The land was purchased by Allen Porter Mullen in 1947.
The deed indicates that the land was vacant when he bought it. 11
Earlier deeds for this property note that this lot was originally two
parcels, one of which was known as the Post Office building lot. 12
Mention is also made in an early deed that a structure (referred to as a
"building", "house", and "frame structure" within the same document) stood
on this lot in 1907 and that the new owner was restricted from demolishing
it until 1908.13
The fourth building in this row, 106 Main Street, was once J. R.
McCurdy's dry goods store. McCurdy bought the property in 1906. According to
earlier deeds, a store owned by John and James Woodsides operated on this
site as early as 1887.14
Long time Huntersville resident Kate Ranson Cornue recalls that
"downtown" formerly occupied three blocks on Main Street. The businesses she
remembers are a meat market, Cross's General Store (later the Ranson
Brothers Grocery), J. R. McCurdy's Dry Goods, Sam Holbrook's Grocery Store,
Mullen's Drug Store and a barber shop. A long hitching rack used to stand in
front of these businesses for shoppers traveling by horse and cart. 15
Now the commercial row sits as an adjunct part of the town. Main Street
began to lose its vitality in the 1920s as automobiles became more popular
and affordable to the public. The commercial activity shifted to the west,
first along NC 115 (Old Statesville Road) and later along the I-77 corridor.
NOTES
1 Legette Blythe and Charles Brockman, Hornet's Nest: The
Story of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,(McNally of Charlotte, 1961):
421.
2 Richard L. Mattson, Historic Landscapes of Mecklenburg
County: The Small Towns. Unpublished manuscript. (July 1991), p. 3. The
A. T.& O. Railroad was originally laid in the area in the 1850s. It was
removed for use elsewhere during the Civil War, and relaid in 1874.
3 Kate Ranson and Thomas Williams, eds. The Mecklenburg
Gazette Magazine Supplement "A Huntersville Album" December 13, 1979.
4 Blythe and Brockman, p. 421.
5 Mattson, p. 5.
6Ranson and Williams.
7 Mattson, p. 5 .
8 See deeds 4781-61, 1-23-84; 436-366, 1-7-21; 862-335, 3-735;
3863-50, 7-29-76, in Mecklenburg County Court House, Register of Deeds.
9 Deed 3863-50, 7-29-76.
10 Deed 1136-61, 11-2-44. Historic Structures short data
report by Mary Beth Gatza, 3-15-88.
11 Deed 1228-123, 1-16-47.
12 Deed 1156-563, 5-17-45.
13 Deed 226-108, 6-27-07.
14 Deed 216-497, 10-19-06.
15 Kate Ranson Cornue, Mecklenburg Gazette "I Remember
When", Clippings File: Huntersville. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Library.
Architectural Sketches: Commercial
Row of Four Buildings on Main Street Huntersville, North Carolina
Prepared by: Ms. Nora M. Black
Most of the commercial buildings that made up the railroad frontage of
the town of Huntersville have been demolished over the years. The few early
buildings remaining on quiet Main Street seem far removed from the rush of
traffic on Interstate 77 or even busy Gilead Road. But it wasn't always so
quiet on Main Street. Once the trains stopped in Huntersville, discharging
noisy passengers and taking on travelers from the surrounding countryside.
Once the farmers from north Mecklenburg County came to Huntersville to sell
their crops, buy their supplies, and negotiate a loan for seed and
fertilizer with the local banker. In the book, North Carolina
Architecture, the author has said, "Main Street, North Carolina,
developed rapidly in the period from 1900 to 1930, assuming a character it
retained throughout most of the century. The small towns ... depended on
sales and manufacturing of local staples, cotton and tobacco, and forest
products; their buildings and their businesses provided the link between the
still agrarian society and the national marketplace." 1
Huntersville was no exception to the Main Street development just described.
The composition and character of the early town of Huntersville was
determined to a great extent by the building types and materials found in
the Main Street buildings. Main Street was given over to commercial
development at its intersection with Huntersville-Concord Road; residential
development was pushed away from the railroad tracks. In cities such as
nearby Charlotte, the open-plan department store stood as the emblem of an
emerging consumer society at the beginning of the 20th century. The
composition of Huntersville, lacking a single store that covered most of a
block, obtained a grander visual effect by having several narrow twenty-five
to thirty foot wide stores integrated into large blocks sharing party walls.
The use of brick as a building material provided a greater measure of safety
from fires than the timber and weatherboards used for early commercial
structures. The freestanding narrow retail stores, with their deep shadowy
back sections fifty to sixty feet from the large storefront windows, are
typical of the vernacular buildings found in crossroad towns and railroad
villages across America. Faint echoes of high-style sources are abstractly
simple ornamental details ... Often only minor features such as brick
patterning at the eaves ... are indicative of the particular period." 2
Although the four buildings present an unbroken front, each is different
in style and material. That difference is apparent to even the most casual
observer walking down Main Street in Huntersville.
Architechtural Sketch: 100 Main
Street
The building at 100 Main Street is located on the west side of Main
Street at the intersection of Huntersville-Concord Rd. The front, or east,
facade of the building faces Main Street; the rear, or west, facade faces
Maxwell Avenue. The building, containing 1,275 square feet, is located on a
rectangular-shaped lot (roughly 30' wide on Main Street by 102' deep) owned
by Ms. Sara Marlene McCraw and houses "Photography Unlimited". A wide
sidewalk runs along the north side of the building facing
Huntersville-Concord Rd.
The building at 100 Main Street is a vernacular interpretation of the
classical style. The use of the classical style for banks at the turn of the
century was the beginning of a departure from the standard commercial style
of building commonly used for early banks in North Carolina. As Bishir
points out, " Banks were typically located on prominent downtown sites,
often at major intersections. Such buildings were planned to take good
advantage of their sites, with architectural emphasis on the side as well as
front elevations." 3 The north side of the former bank is the
only side wall exposed in the commercial row of four buildings; classical
ornament continues along this side. The ground plan is a linear plan that is
three units deep. The building presents a symmetrical, one story, three bay
elevation to Main Street. A parapet above the cornice conceals the
flat roof from view.
The building is constructed of dark reddish-brown brick laid in
running bond. The mortar in the recessed joints is colored to match the
bricks. A simple sheet metal cornice with a wide frieze decorates the front
(east elevation) and the long north side. Below the frieze, a molding trims
the building at the height of the tops of the doors and windows. Wide brick
pilasters terminate at the molding. The front of the building has three
metal vents in the parapet between the concrete coping and the cornice; the
north side has four vents. The owner was having the trim painted dark gray
at the time this report was prepared.
The flat roof is pitched only 11 degrees from the front to the back. The
tin roof was "rolled off like a sardine can lid by Hurricane Hugo" 4
in 1989. The tin roof was replaced with a rubber membrane material. A brick
chimney on the north side of the building still serves the building's
heater.
The large plate glass windows in the storefront and the side of the
building are topped with fixed, multiple-pane sash. Two windows on the north
are double hung wooden sash; each sash contains a single large pane of
glass. Windows on the rear facade have brick infill.
The front elevation is three units wide with the widest units being the
two rectangular windows on either side of the front door. The front door
forms the center unit. Brick pilasters with concrete bases define the entry.
The front entry has a wooden door with one lower wooden panel and a large
panel of glass; the age of the hardware varies. A granite threshold meets
the concrete sidewalk.
Parts of the interior of the building at 100 Main Street have been
modernized. The rooms have original painted moldings and wooden six-panel
doors. Walls are of plaster. Although the exterior looks like a one-story
building, a sheetrock ceiling was laid in by a previous owner. The
installation of that ceiling created a second floor which the current owner
uses for storage. The second floor can only be reached by means of a
disappearing stair. The new ceiling could easily be removed to restore the
building to the original one-story layout; however, almost all of the
pressed tin ceiling panels have been removed from the second floor ceiling
leaving the supporting wood and roof sheathing exposed.
Original mosaic tile with a Greek fret or meander border defines the
customer area of the bank. The original wood flooring of the teller area was
still in place until Hurricane Hugo rolled the tin roof off the building.
The water that came in during the storm damaged the tongue-and-groove
flooring; it was warped beyond repair. Because the wood actually laid on the
ground (and had suffered some termite damage over the years), the insurance
company required the owner to have a concrete slab poured in the areas that
were originally wood. Most of that concrete is covered with carpet at this
time.
The front door opens to a large rectangular room that originally served
as the banking area. A gas furnace, with a manufacture date from the 1930's,
provides heat. The current owner believes that the original heating system
used coal due to the large amount of coal fragments found at the rear of the
building. A partition near the rear runs the width of the building. The door
to the vault is on the north side of the partition. The single metal outer
door conceals two narrow paneled inner doors. Extra tongue-and-groove
flooring provided material for vault shelves for the builders. A door on the
south side of the partition opens to a hallway. A small bathroom and a back
room (now used as a darkroom) take the rest of the space at the rear of the
building.
The building at 100 Main Street anchors the balance of the commercial row
with simple, classical elegance. The current owner plans to continue using
the building as a photography studio. Under her ownership, it would be
maintained in its present style.
Architectural Sketch: 102 Main
Street, Huntersville, North Carolina
The building at 102 Main Street is located on the west side of Main
Street. The front or east facade of the building faces Main Street; the rear
or west facade faces Maxwell Avenue. The building, containing 2,100 square
feet, is located on a rectangular-shaped lot (roughly 35' wide on Main
Street by 102' deep) owned by Mr. Joyce Lee Hager. It houses "Measurement
Controls, Incorporated," a company which assembles gas meters. Number 102
shares party walls with 100 Main Street and 104 Main Street.
The building at 102 Main Street is built in a simple commercial style.
Although it presents two separate entry bays, Number 102 appears to have
been constructed as a single unit. According to the Mecklenburg County tax
records, the ground plan is linear. The building presents a slightly
asymmetrical one-story, two-bay elevation to Main Street. A parapet with a
coping of one course of rowlock brick conceals the flat roof from view. The
building is constructed of rough textured red-orange brick laid in
running bond with white mortar joints. A
soldier course of brick spans the metal header over the storefront
windows and recessed entries. Recessed panels of brick over each storefront
were designed to hold signs. There is a single metal vent centered in each
storefront above the soldier course of brick.
Most of the large display windows in the storefront are covered with
plywood or waferboard. Only two windows in the north storefront are
uncovered. A small window with a sliding panel has been installed in the
covering of the southernmost window. Brick bulkheads, used to support the
weight of the windows, are original. The low bulkheads extend across the
front of the building and into the recessed entrances. There are vents in
the bulkheads on each side of the recessed entrances. Some painted glass
panels (possibly structural glass) are visible over the northern storefront.
Window openings on the rear facade are of the same size, but vary in finish.
The extreme south window has an infill of concrete blocks; the next window
is an industrial style with metal frame; beyond that is a window covered
with plywood with an insulated duct running through its center; and the
extreme north window has an infill of concrete blocks. There are brick
chimneys on both the north and south party walls.
The front elevation consists of two storefronts with each defined by a
three part, window-recessed door-window arrangement. The door of the north
storefront forms the center unit. The original double door, evidenced by the
width and divided transom above, has been reduced to a single door. The door
of the south storefront is covered. A window air conditioning unit has been
installed in the transom area. Both entries have concrete pavers laid on a
slight rise from the sidewalk. Same width boards cover the ceilings of the
recessed entries.
Architectural Sketch: 104 Main
Street, Huntersville, North Carolina
The building at 104 Main Street is located on the west side of Main
Street. The front or east facade of the building faces Main Street; the rear
or west facade faces Maxwell Avenue. The building, containing 2,325 square
feet, is located on a rectangular-shaped lot (roughly 25' wide on Main
Street by 102' deep) owned by Mr. Cecil D. Bradford and wife, Beverly C.
Bradford. It is vacant and shares party walls with 102 Main Street and 106
Main Street.
The building at 104 Main Street is older than the two buildings
previously discussed. Mecklenburg County tax records list 1906 as the year
built; however, officials at the Tax Office indicated that it could have
been built earlier. It is built in a commercial style typical of the late
1800's to early 1900's. This is evidenced by the corbelled brick cornice and
arched windows of the upper story. According to the Mecklenburg County tax
records, the ground plan is linear. The building presents a symmetrical
two-story elevation to Main Street. A parapet with a corbelled brick cornice
of four courses of brick conceals the flat roof from view. It appears that
the upper courses of the cornice were once covered with a skim coat of
concrete. The building is constructed of smooth mixed color bricks (ranging
from red to red-orange to brown) laid in
common bond with sixth course headers. The courses of
headers are mostly dark brown and black as if they had been fired near
the center of the kiln. A rowlock course of brick spans the former display
windows and recessed entry. Slight variations in the size of the bricks are
evident.
The large display windows in the storefront are covered with plywood.
Brick bulkheads, used to support the weight of the windows, are constructed
of newer brick and, although old, do not appear to be original. The low
bulkheads extend across the front of the building and into the recessed
entrances. The vent system in the bulkheads is distinguished by the use of a
rowlock course of brick with every other brick missing. The bulkheads form
engaged columns at the corners of the recessed entrance. The column is
continued in wood to the frieze board. The second floor has two large window
openings covered with painted plywood. The window openings are topped by
segmental arches of two rowlock courses of brick and have sills of two
courses of brick. Window openings on the rear facade are of the same size
and finish.
The front elevation is defined by a three part, window - recessed door
window arrangement. The double door forms the center unit. Like the windows,
the doors are covered by plywood. The entry has square pavers laid on a
slight rise from the sidewalk. The recessed entry has a beaded board
ceiling.
The rear elevation has two arched windows on the second floor similar to
the front elevation. On the first floor, arched windows flank the arched
double doors. The southernmost window opening is covered with a door rather
than plywood.
A coat of smooth stucco covers the back wall from the ground to the
second floor window sills. A white aluminum gutter and two downspouts drain
the water from the roof.
The second floor side elevations do not appear to have any openings or
windows. The side parapets step down in three steps from the front of the
building to the rear and are corbelled in the same manner as the front
parapet. There is a single brick chimney with a corbelled top on the north
party wall.
The building at 104 Main Street is unique in that it is the only two
story building in the Huntersville commercial row. In fact, Mrs. Bradford
remarked that 104 Main Street is "Huntersville's only skyscraper." 6
Architectural Sketch: 106 Main
Street, Huntersville, North Carolina
The building at 106 Main Street is located on the west side of Main
Street. The front or east facade of the building faces Main Street; the rear
or west facade faces Maxwell Avenue. The building, containing 1,553 square
feet, is located on a rectangular-shaped lot (roughly 25' wide on Main
Street by 102' deep) owned by Mr. Jerry Kornegay and wife, Emily Kornegay.
It is currently used to store laundry equipment. Mr. Kornegay believes that
it served the town as a laundromat for approximately thirty years, closing
in 1988. 7 Number 106 shares party walls with 104 Main Street and
108 Main Street (not included in this report).
The building at 106 Main Street is a simple commercial style of the early
1900's with a couple of facade changes. Mecklenburg County tax records list
1924 as the year built; however, officials at the Tax Office indicated that
it could have been built earlier. According to the Mecklenburg County tax
records, the ground plan is linear. The building presents a symmetrical
one-story elevation to Main Street. just as 104 Main Street, the front
elevation is defined by a three part, window - recessed entry with door -
window arrangement. A parapet with a coping of one course of rowlock brick
topped with concrete conceals the flat roof from view. The building is
constructed of smooth yellowish to red-orange brick laid in common bond with
sixth course headers. As seen in 104 Main Street, the header courses are
mostly dark brown and black as if they had been fired near the center of the
kiln. Mortar used matches the tone of the bricks. A decorative panel of
brick is set three courses below the coping of the front parapet. It
consists of a rowlock course and a soldier course of brick turned on the
diagonal. The decorative panel spans most of the front of the building. Two
stretcher courses of corbelled brick add even more texture to the wall. A
recessed panel of brick at the center of the storefront was designed to hold
a long, narrow sign.
A metal canopy spans the width of the building. Since it is not original,
it could easily be removed to show the entire storefront without the visual
isolation now imposed on the upper portion of the facade. The large
six-panel display windows with thick wooden muntins are not original. Brick
bulkheads, used to support the weight of the windows, were added at some
point. A single rowlock course of brick provides a sill for the windows. The
brick of the bulkheads is newer than the brick of the rest of the facade.
Mortar used in the bulkhead joints is white. It is a machine made brick with
an incised wave pattern. The low bulkheads extend across the front of the
building and into the recessed entrance. A steel door with a small square
opening (unglazed) has been installed for security. A wooden panel covers
the ceiling of the recessed entrance. Each side has a three panel display
window. There is a single low step from the sidewalk to the concrete floor
of the recessed entrance and another step at the threshold.
Window openings on the rear facade, covered with painted plywood, have
segmental arches of two courses of rowlock brick. The two window openings
flank the arched double doors. At some point, a portion of the arch over the
double doors was closed with incised brick like that found in the bulkheads
on the building's front; replacement doors were installed in the smaller
opening. The newer, incised brick also replaced the smooth red-orange brick
between the doorway and the north window. There are two metal chimneys near
the rear of the building. Side elevations of 104 Main Street are not visible
since the adjoining buildings are two-story structures.
The front door opens to a room that encompasses almost the entire
building. The only enclosed areas, rest rooms and a small mechanical room,
are in the south corner at the back of the building. The floor is of
concrete with some traces of floor paint still visible. The plaster walls
are painted yellow and white. White panels with narrow battens cover the
ceiling. Rows of washers and dryers line the room. A gas unit heater hung
from the ceiling provides heat. A sodium vapor street lamp provides light.
There is a column in the center of the building, but it is not structural.
It enclosed water pipes for the two rows of washing machines in the center
of the building. Dryers lined the side walls.
Conclusion
The Main Street commercial row of four buildings in Huntersville is an
intact example of the growth of a commercial architectural style from the
last years of the 19th century into the middle of the 20th century. It is
vital to an understanding of Huntersville's development because of its
orientation to the railroad tracks. The finishes and decorative details of
the four buildings are restrained and simple in contrast to the
architectural details found in urban centers of the same period. It is not
so hard to imagine the turn of the 21st century with light rail passenger
trains stopping in Huntersville across the street from a revitalized
commercial row. Noisy commuters could walk to a small grocery for dinner
supplies. They could stop at a photography studio to pick up their kid's
graduation pictures. A pharmacy could supply a bottle of aspirin while the
laundry/ dry cleaner could have clean shirts waiting. These four handsome
buildings, three in use everyday, remain as a core providing development
opportunity in Huntersville.
Notes
1 Catherine W. Bishir, with photography by Tim Buchman,
North Carolina Architecture. (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1990), 400.
2 Carole Rifkind, A Field Guide to American Architecture.
(New York, 1980), 193-195.
3 Bishir, 403-405.
4 Interview with Ms. Sara Marlene McCraw, 15 February 1992.
5 B. Clarkson Schoettle, 'Keeping Up Appearances: Storefront
Guidelines,' Main Street: A Publication of the National Trust for Historic
Preservation, 1983,1-16.
6 Telephone Interview with Mrs. Beverly C. Bradford, I 1
February 1992.
7 Interview with Mr. Jerry Kornegay, 15 February 1992.
|